Tous les avis

For all here who doubt. I run the half ti cassette together with a rotor crank. I run this already 5k and not one bad shift ! I have no comparison with other stuff like Recon. Honestly I don't feel any different then a da cassette. But those da stamped cassettes are soft as hell. Sixwheels aka ti master sells other stuff too. Compared to stock stuff those things are pieces of art. Da looks cheap to that stuff. Their axles are a thing of beauty and are half the weight and don't rip above 20nm. The Ti master axles initially at 29gr where so strong that they broke the hub (50nm) The direct mount hangers fit like a glove. Or check the 1.4gr rear derailleur bolt. Maybe you can ask long term member rhino here what he thinks about Evan's stuff He buys them with the container so to speak ... As far as I have been told the shift ramps are not 1-1 copies at all as it would idd be a patent infringement I almost sound like a reseller But for me and a few mechanics who have seen this stuff irl now they all are impressed with the craftsmanship. It's a costly affair but I will replace all my stuff on my other bike as soon as my da cassette is worn out ... takes like 25k km before I can do so But of course everyone is free to decide it's not even close to say what s parts or frames and gears sells

This Ryet RS OSPW is actually really good because it has properly sealed bearings. I've done about 1000km often on wet and dirty roads with it now and it spins like new without any need for oiling and stuff. I didn't open or measure the bearings but they looked like some standard sealed bearings from the outside.

I've had this on my gravel bike for 2 years. No electrical tape, no additional loctite (there might've been some from the factory) and it holds perfectly. It looks clean and I can put the bike in the workstand without the radar being in the way. One of my favourite little bike accessories.

Did my first ride today (~72km) and I'm really happy with the result. It's comfortable, has lots of grip and is feels quick. But I don't have any data to back that up. I simply believe the latest research which shows that... • wider tires reduce rolling resistance • increasing comfort through greater air volume as suspension minimizes rider fatigue And all of that without compromising performance. The widths match quite nice according the 105%-rule (42mm outer rim width; 39.5mm tire width). The Michelin Pro 5 tires have an unmounted tread width of 45mm, which is even more than the Pirelli P Zero 40-622 at 42mm. This means that even when stretched, the risk of running off the tread is reduced. Regarding ETRTO compliance: I don't really like the concept of regulatory documents being behind a paywall. Additionally, it seems that bicycle tire standards are outdated and not up to current requirements. The complexity also exceeds that of car/motorcycle tire standards. While ETRTO is indeed a technical institution with regulatory purposes and its importance is highly regarded in various forums, threads, and Reddit discussions, this apparently doesn't tell the whole story. This article provides valuable insights: The most prominent example of deviating from ETRTO standards is SRAM/Zipp. They allow a 40mm tire on their 303 XPLR wheels (32mm inner width rim) through their 'dual testing' approach, far from ETRTO standards.